Wednesday 24 April 2013

Can volumetric efficiency help confirm my suspected faulty MAF meter?

I hadn't heard of volumetric efficiency until I found the excellent articles on the MOTOR magazine web site. These contain a wealth of practical information on engine operation and faults and have been the inspiration for my on going work.

Basically, volumetric efficiency concerns how efficiently air flows through the engine and is the ratio of measured flow to theoretical flow. On a normally aspirated engine this is not going to be 100% because of several factors. The more obvious of these are the resistance to air flow offered by the air filter, valves and ducting coupled with the back pressure etc from the exhaust system.

The torque app calculates volumetric efficiency and so, just like the MAF data, I plotted this against engine revolutions.

This was the data before cleaning the MAF meter. (Note: at approximately 2500 rpm the turbo begins to provide boost. At approximately 1800rpm, I think, the EGR valve should be closed and therefore the MAF meter is reading all of the air flow into the engine.)



And this after cleaning


It clearly demonstrates the effect of cleaning the MAF! Why is the improvement so much more noticeable on this data than the simple MAF figures? I'm not quite sure but air flow temperature and manifold pressure are used in the calculations and these might now be measuring more accurately as well.

One thing that does surprise me is that a 100% wasn't reached. My surprise is because the engine has a turbo charger and so the air is being forced through the engine which will tend to negate the air flow resistance mentioned earlier. So could this mean the MAF meter is reading low? That would be consistent with information I have read on the most common characteristic of a faulty MAF meter. Perhaps some readings taken whilst driving may be useful. (The above and earlier graphs are based on data obtained with the car stationery).


Tuesday 23 April 2013

To buy a new MAF or not to buy?

Although there does appear to be some noticeable improvement does this indicate the MAF is the key cause of the problems? Could it just be a contributing factor and perhaps another component like the EGR valve?

Without a doubt a modern internal combustion engine is a complex system. Before starting this work I had very little knowledge of turbo's, exhaust gas recycling (EGR), mass air flow (MAF) meters etc. but with the help of my smartphone, Torque Android app and device to connect to the car management interface my knowledge is increasing rapidly. I never thought a computer would become as important for maintaining my car as my spanners, allen keys etc!

On my diesel engined BMW I now know that the air passes first through the filter and then the flow rate is measured by the MAF. Next the air enters the turbo where the pressure is boosted and sent through the intercooler before it enters the EGR valve. The EGR valve then mixes the clean air with exhaust gases (for combustion reasons to reduce diesel knock and emmissions) before it enters the inlet manifold and two possible routes. One is a longer route and controlled by a butterfly valve in each inlet manifold port. The purpose of this route, as I understand it, is to get better driveability e.g. smoothing pulling away/ torque at low revs.

From the above description it can be appreciated that there is great margin for error and great necessity for monitoring and control which, of course, is the job of the Engine Control Unit/Engine Management Computer/Power Train module or whatever you want to call it. And as I've found there are a multitude of sensors measuring things such as pressure and temperature and actuators and controls to make things happen.

On my car the actuators tend to be vacuum powered. For example, the EGR valve is opened and closed by an electrical valve which controls a vacuum which acts on a diaphragm and opens a hole to allow the exhaust gas into the stream of clean air. But the decisions the ECU has to make are complex.

For example, the ECU has to know that the exhaust gas pressure is higher than the inlet pressure. So it has to close when the turbo is beginning to develop pressure (which implies the EGR valve only operates at low revs). Then there is the question of how much exhaust gas to admit. This is deduced by measuring the air flow by the MAF and knowing how fast the engine is turning. Overall, there are many things that can begin to go wrong as they get old, dirty and worn.

On my diesel, one of the first things I looked at was the EGR because comments I had read in other forums and blogs seemed to point to this being a potential cause of some of the symptoms. I took it off, simply cleaned it, and got 10mpg better fuel consumption on a long run. That was an amazing return for simple cleaning. However, unfortunately the necessity for cleaning, I'm reasonably confident to state, has been  caused by the problem I suspect is the MAF meter. The coking up of the EGR valve really does look like too much unburnt fuel and I hope this is not affecting things like the turbo or exhaust system. But I want to be confident it is the MAF before spending a lot of money on a replacement.

One of my biggest problems is that I don't know what a correctly operating engine should look like. So are there any other parameters I can measure to help? Well I've come across something called volumetric efficiency. This might give me further indications. It's a measure of how much 'gas' is actually passing through the engine compared to the theoretical amount. More about this in the next post I think.

Monday 22 April 2013

Can the ECU provide more information to diagnose the problem

With a genuine replacement MAF meter costing upwards of £170 (dealer price £312.02!!) is there any further diagnostic work that can help determine the cause of the error code. And as well as the error code is deteriorating performance and fuel economy. In attempt to diagnose the problem with more confidence the Android Torque app in conjunction with the ELM 327 interface was used to obtain some basic engine operating data.

This is the air flow rate entering the engine plotted against engine revs.


Next the MAF was cleaned and the air flow rate measured again.

Interestingly the correlation looks cleaner i.e. not so many spurious plots and for reference this is the cleaner used.


BMW Recommendations

Having reached a dead end resolving the meaning of the standardised OBD fault code P3263 I decided that, since my car was with the dealer, I would take advantage of the opportunity and pay for an official BMW diagnostic. This returned their code of 3FF0.

To my satisfaction this also pointed to an air flow problem and the advice was to look at two possible reasons. The simplest was the air mass air flow meter and the second was coking up of the cylinder head. However, the latter being rare on my car but more common when the engine is fitted in an X3. A strange occurrence but a relief since a decoke would be a very expensive fault to remedy. However, determining if a decoke was necessary would mean I would have to remove the inlet manifold for a closer look at the air ways.